Title page for 984307016


[Back to Results | New Search]

Student Number 984307016
Author Li-kung Wang(王儷宮)
Author's Email Address No Public.
Statistics This thesis had been viewed 621 times. Download 0 times.
Department Executive Master of Human Resource Management
Year 2010
Semester 2
Degree Master
Type of Document Master's Thesis
Language zh-TW.Big5 Chinese
Title Effect of Leadership on Team Performance – Team Type as a moderator
Date of Defense 2011-06-03
Page Count 65
Keyword
  • leadership behavior of the team leader
  • team performance
  • type of team
  • Abstract Individual's outstanding performance is no longer occupying the center stage focus in today’s enterprises, but team work is. Team work is an ability to achieve self fulfillment through the success of others which is the feature characteristic for modern organization. More and more high performing teams in an organization setting have proven the value and benefits of adapting team work function in modern organization setting.
    In this study we discuss the key factors of highly effective team performance by examining the effects of leadership behavior of the team leader on team performance. Firstly the study examine on the effects of leadership behavior on team performance of team task-orientated and interpersonal support oriented respectively; then we further analyze how performance may changes from one to another by adding team type as the performance moderator; and finally we examine whether the leadership behavior of transitional leadership and interpersonal support has an impact on team performance in technology and manufacture industries.
    This study result may help the team leaders of technology manufacturing companies and different type of teams to understand the impact of leadership on team performance and to identify under the context of different teams how leadership can facilitate higher team performance. Enterprises that applying team as the core structure of their organization may identify the best relationship through the interaction between leadership styles and team structure design, which will facilitate the team collaboration capabilities that working towards common values to enhance the quality of team and organizational competitiveness advantage.
    Table of Content 第一章、緒論............................................................................................. 1
    1.1 研究背景與動機............................................................................................ 1
    1.2 研究目的........................................................................................................ 2
    1.3 研究範圍........................................................................................................ 3
    第二章、相關文獻探討 ............................................................................ 4
    2.1 團隊定義與團隊績效.................................................................................... 4
    2.2 領導相關理論、領導行為與團隊績效關聯................................................ 5
    2.3 團隊特點及團隊種類.................................................................................... 8
    2.4 團隊型態、領導行為、團隊績效關聯探討.............................................. 12
    2.5 研究假設...................................................................................................... 16
    第三章、研究方法 .................................................................................. 17
    3.1 研究架構...................................................................................................... 17
    3.2 研究樣本...................................................................................................... 18
    3.3 研究程序...................................................................................................... 19
    3.4 統計分析...................................................................................................... 24
    第四章、資料分析與研究結果 .............................................................. 25
    4.1 描述性統計.................................................................................................. 25
    4.2 相關分析...................................................................................................... 29
    4.3 團隊領導行為與團隊效能之關係探討...................................................... 31
    4.4 結果分析討論.............................................................................................. 36
    第五章、結論與建議 .............................................................................. 41
    5.1 研究結論...................................................................................................... 41
    5.2 管理意涵...................................................................................................... 43
    5.3 未來的研究方向.......................................................................................... 45
    參考文獻 ................................................................................................... 46
    Reference 中文部份
    1. 王士偉 (2008)。領導風格與成員人格特質之互動過程與績效之研究-以資訊系統開發專案觀點。世新大學資訊管理學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    2. 王幸琪 (2007)。探討績效評量指標建構原則對我國電子業員工紅利制度激勵效果之影響。國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
    3. 王嘉珍 (2009)。知識團隊之成員多樣化與團隊績效之研究—團隊認知及知識整合之中介效果。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所博士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
    4. 王建忠 (2001)。團隊領導與團隊效能:團隊內互動的中介效果。國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。。
    5. 李弘暉、鍾麗英 (1999)。團隊運作過程對團隊績效影響之研究。人力資源管理學報,11,1-30。
    6. 李尉慈 (2009)。團隊目標導向與轉換型領導對團隊績效之影響-團隊情感氛圍之中介效果。東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    7. 吳甘霖 (2006)。創新型領導,中國機械出版社。
    8. 吳松齡 (2009)。創新管理。台北市:五南。
    9. 房美玉 (2002)。儲備幹部人格特質甄選量表之建立與應用—以某高科技公司為例。人力資源管理學報。2(1),1-18。
    10. 林家琦 (2008)。組織公民行為與領導風格對團隊績效之影響-以學生專案團隊為例,國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
    11. 邱淑妙 (2006)。團隊人格特質、轉換型領導與團隊效能之關係探討—團隊凝聚力之中介角色。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    12. 張麗英 (2003)。人力資源管理策略對團隊績效的影響-以軟體產業為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    13. 張倉榮、胡國強、侯君溥 (1998)。企業內專案團隊效能模式之研究。中華管理評論,1(1)。
    14. 王精文、徐碧慧、李珍玫 (2007)。創造力人格、領導型態與績效關係之探討。台大管理論叢,17(2),159-182。
    15. 許士軍 (1990)。管理學。台北:台灣東華書局。
    16. 許雅婷 (2002)。人格特質與團隊組合對知識分享、創新績效的影響。東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    17. 陳志發 (2002)。員工股票選擇權滿意度對離職意願、組織承諾關係之研究 – 以外商高科技為例。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
    18. 陳盈純 (2002)。互依性和社會支持對研發團隊績效的影響-以溝通為干擾變項。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
    19. 陳姵君 (2009)。研發團隊成員創造力人格組成與專案類型對專案績效之影響。國立中興大學企業管理學系所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
    20. 曾素雉 (2001)。工作團隊中工作價值觀、團隊特性與團隊績效之相關研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    21. 黃敏萍、鄭伯壎、周麗芳 (2002)。家長式領導及其效能:華人企業團隊的證據。華人心理學報,3(1),85-112。
    22. 黃敏萍、戚樹誠、黃國隆 (2002)。跨功能任務團隊之結構與效能:一項結構權變模式之觀點。管理學報,19(6),979-1007。
    23. 黃敏萍、鄭博燻、王建忠 (2003)。轉換型領導、團隊內互動、及團隊與成員效能:IPO 模型之驗證。管理學報,20(3),397-428頁。
    24. 黃堅生 (2002)。團隊領導、團隊型態對團隊歷程之影響研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    25. 黎導 (譯) (1996)。M. West 著。成功的團隊工作。香港:商務印書館。
    26. 楊力彥 (2001)。團隊績效獎勵制度知覺對於員工薪資滿意度與工作態度之影響。國立中央大學企業管理研究所,未出版,桃園縣。
    27. 葉桂珠 (2004)。企業激勵薪酬設計因子對組織吸引力之影響—以高科技公司新進研發人員為例。人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
    28. 廖乾助 (2004)。團隊多元化與團隊衝突對專案團隊績效的影響。國立中央大學企業管理研究所,未出版,桃園縣。
    29. 廖川億 (1996)。研究發展團隊特性與創新績效關係之研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    30. 趙興中 (2002)。團隊領導對於團隊效能之影響-以桃園縣消防局為例。元智大學管理研究所,未出版,桃園縣。
    31. 劉秀雈 (2004)。國際團隊多元性、團隊領導與企業組織環境支援之探討。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    32. 蔡居隆 (2002)。領導型態與主管效能之研究─以台灣南區郵政管理局為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    33. 潘韋汝 (2005)。團隊獎勵制度對員工工作態度之影響-以薪資制度與福利滿意度為干擾變項。國立中央大學第十一屆企業人力資源管理實務專題成果發表會,桃園縣。
    34. 鄭麗芳 (2005)。領導風格與工作滿意度對情感性承諾影響之研究。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
    35. 賴以倫 (2002)。高科技廠商薪資策略與離職率之關係探討。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
    36. 賴淑蓉 (2004)。從組織公帄性的觀點探討團隊獎酬與財務誘因對績效之影響。靜宜大學會計學系研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
    37. 顏麗真 (2001)。人力資源管理制度對組織人才吸引力之影響:交互作用之探討。國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    38. 簡瑜君 (2002)。工作團隊特性與團隊效能之關係-以訓練與管理者支持為干擾變項。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
    英文部份
    1. Aime, F., Meyer, C. J., and Humphrey, S.E., (2010). Legitimacy of team rewards: Analyzing legitimacy as a condition for the effectiveness of team incentive designs, Journal of Business Research, 63(1): 60-66.
    2. Anthony, T. C., (2007), Leading project teams: An introduction to the basics of project management and project team leadership, Journal of Product Innovation Management
    3. Balkin, D. B., Montemayor, E. F., (2000), Explaining team-based pay: A contingency perspective based on the organizational life cycle, team design, and organizational learning literatures, Human Resource Management Review, 10(3): 249-269.
    4. Balkundi P, Harrison, D., A., (2006), Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure's effects on team viability and performance, Academy of Management Journal, 49(1): 49-68.
    5. Balkundi, P., Barsness, Z., and Michael, J. H., (2009), Unlocking the Influence of Leadership Network Structures on Team Conflict and Viability, Small Group Research, 40(3): 301-322.
    6. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M.J. and Mount, M.K., (1998) Relating Member Ability and Personality to Work-Team Processes and Team Effectiveness, Journal of applied psychology, 83(3): 377-391.
    7. Bartol, K. M., & Hagmann, L. L., (1992). Team-Based Pay Plans:A Key To Effective
    Teamwork, Compensation and Benefits Review, 24(6): 24.
    8. Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S.E., Moon, H., and Conlon, D. E., (2003), Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach, Academy of Management Journal, 46(5):572-601.
    9. Bell, S.T., (2007), Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3):595-615..
    10. Boone, C., Olffen W. V., and Witteloostuijn A. V., (2005) Team locus-of-control composition, leadership structure, information acquisition, and financial performance: A business simulation study, Academy of Management Journal,48(5): 889-909.
    11. Callow, N., Smith, M. J., Hardy, L., et. al., (2009), Measurement of Transformational Leadership and its Relationship with Team Cohesion and Performance Level, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21(4): 395-412.
    12. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., and Higgs, A. C., (1993), Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups, Personnel Psychology, 46(4): 823–847.
    13. Cohen, W. B., & Bailey, D. E., (1997), What make team work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite, Journal of Management, 23(3): 239-290.
    14. David, V. D., Gronnb, P., and Salas, E., (2006), Leadership in team-based organizations: On the threshold of a new era‖, The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3): 211-216.
    15. Dionne, S.D., Yammarino, F.J., Atwater, L.E., et al, (2004), Transformational leadership and team performance, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(2):177– 193.
    16. Doorewaard, H., Hootegem, G. V., Huys, R., (2002), Team responsibility structure and team performance, Personnel Review, 31(3): 356 – 370.
    17. Faraj, S., & Sproull, L., (2000), Coordinating expertise in software development teams, Management Science, 46(12): 1554-1568.
    18. Friedrich, T. L., Vessey, W. B., Schuelke, M. J., et al., (2009), A framework for understanding collective leadership: The selective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks, Leadership Quarterly, 20(6): 933-958.
    19. Gibson C. B., (1999), Do They Do What They Believe They Can? Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness across Tasks and Cultures, Academy of Management Journal, 42(2): 138-152.
    20. Gibson, C. B., Randel, A. E., & Earley, A. E., (2000), Understanding Group Efficacy : An Empirical Test of Multiple Assessment Methods, Group and Organization Management, 25(1): 67-97.
    21. Guzzo, R. A., and Dickson, M. W. , (1996), Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness, Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1): 307-338.
    22. Heneman, R. L., Hippel, C. V., (1995), Balancing Group and Individual Rewards Rewarding Individual Contributions to the Team, Compensation & Benefits Review, 27(4): 63-68.
    23. Hiller, N. J., Day, D. V., Vance, R. J., (2006), Collective enactment of leadership roles and team effectiveness: A field study, Leadership Quarterly, 17(4): 387-397.
    24. Hollenbeck, J. R., Henry, M., Aleksander, P. J. E., Bradley, J. W., et. al., (2002), Structural Contingency Theory and Individual Differences: Examination of External and Internal Person–Team Fit, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3): 599-606.
    25. Humphrey, S. E., Morgeson, F. P., Mannor, M. J., (2009), Developing a Theory of the Strategic Core of Teams: A Role Composition Model of Team Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1): 48-61.
    26. Hyatt, D. E. & Ruddy, T. M., (1997), An Examination of The RelationshipBetween Work Group Characteristics and Performance:Once More into The Breech, Personnel Psychology, 50: 553-585.
    27. Irlenbusch, B., Ruchala, G. K., (2008), Relative rewards within team-based compensation, Labour Economics, 15(2): 141-167.
    28. Jessup, H. R., (1990), New role in team leadership, Training and Development Journal, 44(11): 79-83.
    29. Jennifer, M. G., Lawrence, R. J., (1993), Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: Comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5): 798-804.
    30. Jung, D.I., Sosik, J. J., (2002), Transformational leadership in work groups: The role of empowerment, cohesiveness, and collective-efficacy on perceived group performance, Small Group Research, 33(3): 313-336.
    31. Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., and Avolio, B. J., (1997), Effects of leadership style and problem structure on work group process and outcomes in an electronic meeting system environment, Personnel Psychology, 50(1): 121–146.
    32. Kara, A. A., Julian, B., Kelloway, E. K., (2001), Transformational leadership or the iron cage: which predicts trust, commitment and team efficacy?, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22(7): 315 – 320.
    33. Kavadias, S., Sommer, S. C., (2009), The Effects of Problem Structure and Team Diversity on Brainstorming Effectiveness, Management Science, 55(12); 1899-1913.
    34. Kearney, E., Gebert, D., (2009), Managing Diversity and Enhancing TeamOutcomes: The Promise of Transformational Leadership, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 77-89.
    35. Keller, R. T., (2006), Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1): 202-210.
    36. Kirkman, B.L., Shapiro, D.L., (2000), Understanding Why Team Members Won’t Share An Examination of Factors Related to Employee Receptivity to Team-Based Rewards, Small Group Research, 31(2):175.
    37. Kittur, A., Lee, B., and Kraut, R. E., (2009) Coordination in collective intelligence: the role of team structure and task interdependence, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems.
    38. LePine, J. A., (2003), Team adaptation and postchange performance: Effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1): 27-39.
    39. Mannheim, B., and Halamish, H., (2008), Transformational leadership as related to team outcomes and contextual moderation, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29(7): 617 – 630.
    40. Marks, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Mathieu, J. E., (2000), Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6): 971-986..
    41. Martin, J. E., and Oliver, S., (2000), Managing team knowledge: core processes, tools and enabling factors, European Management Journal, 18(3): 334-341.
    42. McClurg, L. N., (2001), Team Rewards: How Far Have We Come?, Human Resource Management, 40(1): 73–86.
    43. Montmarquette, C., Rulliere, J. L., Villeval, M. C., Zeiliger, R., (2004), Redesigning teams and incentives in a merger: An experiment with managers and students, Management Science, 50(10): 1379-1389.
    44. Murry, W. D., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., (2002), A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance, Group & Organization Management, 27(1):66-96.
    45. Price, K. H., Harrison, D. A., Gavin, J. H., (2006), Withholding inputs in team contexts: Member composition, interaction processes, evaluation structure, and social loafing, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6): 1375-1384.
    46. Reilly, P., Phillipson, J, Smith, P., (2005), Team-Based Pay in the United Kingdom, Compensation & Benefits Review, 37(4): 54-60.
    47. Sarin, S., McDermott, C., (2003), The Effect of Team Leader Characteristics on Learning, Knowledge Application, and Performance of Cross-Functional New Product Development Teams, Decision Sciences, 34(4): 707–739.
    48. Schaubroeck, J, Lam, S. S. K., Cha, S. E., (2007), Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4):1020-1030.
    49. Scott, S. G., & Einstein, W. O., (2001), Strategic Performance Appraisal in Team-Based Organizations: One Size Does Not Fit All, The Academy of Management Executive, 15(2): 107-116.
    50. Somech, A., (2006), The Effects of Leadership Style and Team Process onPerformance and Innovation in Functionally Heterogeneous Teams, Journal of Management, 32(1): 132-157.
    51. Sosik, J.J., Avolio, B.J. and Kahai, S.S., (1997), Effects of Leadership Style and Anonymity on Group Potency and Effectiveness in a Group Decision Support System Environment, Journal of applied psychology,82(1): 89-103.
    52. Stantona, N. A., Ashleigha, M. J., (2000), A field study of team working in a new human supervisory control system, Ergonomics, 43(8): 1190 – 1209.
    53. Stashevsky, S., Koslowsky, M., (2006), Leadership team cohesiveness and team performance, International Journal of Manpower, 27(1): .63 – 74.
    54. Stewart, G. L., Barrick, M. R., (2000), Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type, Academy of Management Journal, 43(2): 135-148.
    55. Swailes, S., McIntyre-Bhatty, T., (2004), Scale structure of the Team Role Self Perception Inventory, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(4): 525–529.
    56. Taggar, S., Brown, T. C., (2001), Problem-solving team behaviors - Development and validation of BOS and a hierarchical factor structure, Small Group Research, 32(6): 698-726.
    57. Thamhain, H. J., (2005), Team Leadership Effectivness in Technology-Based Project Environments, Engineering Management Review, 35(4): 35-46.
    58. Wang, E., Chou, H. W., Jiang, J., (2005), The impacts of charismatic leadership style on team cohesiveness and overall performance during ERP implementation, International Journal of Project Management, 23(3):173-180.
    59. Webber, S. S., (2002), Leadership and trust facilitating cross-functional team success, Journal of Management Development, 21(3): 201 - 214.
    60. Werner, J. M. and Lester, S. W. (2001), Applying a team effectiveness framework to the performance of student case teams. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4): 385–402.
    61. Williamsm H. M., Parker, S. K., Turner, N., (2010), Proactively performing teams: The role of work design, transformational leadership, and team composition, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2): 301–324.
    62. Wing, L. S., (2005), Leadership in high-performance teams: a model for superior team performance, Team Performance Management, 11: 4-11.
    63. Yang, H. L., Tang, H. H., (2004), Team structure and team performance in IS development: a social network perspective, Information & Management, 41(3):335-349.
    64. Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., Marks, M. A., (2001), Team Leadership, The Leadership Quarterly, 12(4): 451-483.
    65. Zenger, T. R., Marshall, C. R., (2000), Determinants of incentive intensity in group-based rewards, Academy of Management Journal, 43(2):149-163.
    Advisor
  • Nien-chi Liu(劉念琪)
  • Files
  • 984307016.pdf
  • disapprove authorization
    Date of Submission 2011-07-13

    [Back to Results | New Search]


    Browse | Search All Available ETDs

    If you have dissertation-related questions, please contact with the NCU library extension service section.
    Our service phone is (03)422-7151 Ext. 57407,E-mail is also welcomed.