Title page for 983205012


[Back to Results | New Search]

Student Number 983205012
Author Kuo-chang Wu(吳國正)
Author's Email Address No Public.
Statistics This thesis had been viewed 275 times. Download 97 times.
Department Graduate Institute of Construction Engineering and Management
Year 2010
Semester 2
Degree Master
Type of Document Master's Thesis
Language zh-TW.Big5 Chinese
Title A study on review system of product substitution in public works
Date of Defense 2011-06-23
Page Count 91
Keyword
  • Government Procurement Law
  • restrict of competition
  • review system
  • substitutions
  • Abstract   The purpose of establishing the Law of Government Procurement, Article 26, is to reduce competition and bid rigging problems, even to restrict and avoid them. Most owners of public construction works are government agencies, which may not retain professional engineering expertise. But according to the Law, the review of substitutions are conducted by them. The lack of engineering expertise causes these agencies to tighten the possibility of allowing the use of substitutes. Therefore, despite there is provisions for the substitutions, there is no opportunity to use it.
      Past research focused on the issue of substitutions in public construction works, and generally proposed that a special-purpose system for reviewing substitutions is necessary. According to the natureof adopting substitutions, this work introduces five specific aspects for discussion: 1. Complexity, 2. Transparency of information, 3. Review costs, 4. Time, 5. Owner’s ability of review. The special-purpose review system can be divided into 1. Internal review, 2. Experts review meeting, and 3. Commissioned. Review. These three review methods are also mentioned in the Law of Government Procurement, Article 26, the executive notes. This work examine the ways of using the review methods appropriately. For example, condition 1 is the low complexity, condition 2 is that the transparency of information is sufficient, condition 3 is having enough review costs, and the owner could base these three conditions in order to decide which methods of review is appropriate. Because internal review is not so complicated and the information is transparent, the owner does not need to worry about that this method will lead to dissatisfaction with firms, or being suspected that any bid rigging is taking place. It means that this method of review is appropriate for these parts. But if the complexity is higher, in order to avoid controversy, a professional team is commissioned to help substitution reviews . It can examined by meeting or by commissioned to reach a fair situation. It is the main expectation of this work that the use and the connotation of the substitutions could be enhanced.
    Table of Content 摘  要 I
    Abstract II
    致  謝 IV
    目  錄 VI
    圖 目 錄 VIII
    表 目 錄 IX
    第一章 緒論 1
    1-1研究背景與動機 1
    1-2研究目的 2
    1-3研究方法 2
    1-4研究限制 2
    1-5研究流程 3
    第二章 文獻回顧 5
    2-1同等品之定義 5    
    2-2同等品制度之形成背景 5
    2-3同等品制度之法令沿革 6
    2-4相關研究整理 13
    第三章 公共工程同等品機制之現況分析 17
    3-1自行審查 17
    3-2開會審查 19
    3-3委託審查 20
    3-4小結 21
    第四章 同等品審查機制之研議 24
    4-1訪談動機及目的 24
    4-2公家機關對審查機制之看法 30
    4-3設計單位對審查機制之看法 39
    4-4PCM對審查機制之看法 48
    4-5小結 59
    第五章 結論與建議 69
    5-1結論 69
    5-2建議 71
    參考文獻 72
    附錄 74
    Reference 一、學位論文及專題研究計畫類
    1.林耕宇,「公有建築工程同等品制度之研究」,國立臺灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文,1998。
    2.梁美雪,「公共工程使用同等品之經濟分析」,國立中山大學中山學術研究所碩士論文,2002。
    3.盧冠文,「政府採購規格制度之研究 -以建築工程同等品評估及其監控機制為例-」,國立臺灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文,2003。
    4.鄭雅友,「公共工程同等品制度之研究」,國立成功大學建築學系碩士論文,2004。
    5.吳佩菁,「公共工程採用同等品爭議之研究—以情事變更原則為中心」,朝陽科技大學營建工程系碩士論文,2006。
    二、期刊雜誌類
    1.立平,「淺談建材上「同等品」認定與使用之有關問題」,會計與管理,頁365-366,837期。
    2.王榮吉,「建立公共工程建材同等品級分類制度應積極推動」,營建物價,頁11-14,18期。
    3.吳憲彰,「談指定廠牌或參考廠牌及同等品之問題」,營造天下,頁26-30,76期。
    4.黃國立,『淺談「替代方法實施法」』,現代營建283期,P61-64。
    5.謝定亞,「替代方案實施辦法之評議」,營建管理季刊55期,P1-6。
    三、網際網路
    1.國家圖書館全球資訊網,http://www.ncl.edu.tw/mp.asp?mp=2,(查詢日期2011年5月14日)
    2.全國法規資料庫,http://law.moj.gov.tw/,(查詢日期2011年5月14日)
    3.行政院公共工程委員會,http://www.pcc.gov.tw/,(查詢日期2011年5月14日)
    四、相關書籍
    1.行政院公共工程委員會,政府採購法令彙編,民98。
    Advisor
  • Ting-ya Hsieh(謝定亞)
  • Files
  • 983205012.pdf
  • approve in 2 years
    Date of Submission 2011-07-19

    [Back to Results | New Search]


    Browse | Search All Available ETDs

    If you have dissertation-related questions, please contact with the NCU library extension service section.
    Our service phone is (03)422-7151 Ext. 57407,E-mail is also welcomed.