Title page for 973402009


[Back to Results | New Search]

Student Number 973402009
Author Hung-kun Ku(古鴻坤)
Author's Email Address No Public.
Statistics This thesis had been viewed 1046 times. Download 712 times.
Department Civil Engineering
Year 2009
Semester 2
Degree Ph.D.
Type of Document Doctoral Dissertation
Language zh-TW.Big5 Chinese
Title The study for establish of sustainable public works appraisal criteria
Date of Defense 2010-07-01
Page Count 173
Keyword
  • Appraise
  • SEM
  • Sustainable infrastructure
  • web-survey
  • Abstract The ecosystem and environment of the surrounding areas would be impacted significantly by the infrastructure of the site. In the past, the impacts neglected in economic development emphasized the overriding of countries in the world. It resulted in many unnecessary and avoidable negative consequences. By using the Google document to generate a survey questionnaire for distributing to stakeholders in Taiwan's construction sector is one of the methodologies in this study. The stakeholders include academics, planners, designers, construction industry, and agencies involved in the operation and maintenance of infrastructure. A total of 850 solicitations yielded 391 effective responses to the online survey. A SPSS factorial analysis followed to analyze the results and to develop a sustainability evaluation system. The evaluation system consists of 18 criteria under six main constructs: local practice/tradition, public opinions, pollution and waste, ecology and preservation, appropriateness of scale, and carbon footprint. The system was successfully tested and validated using four new construction projects in Taiwan.
    Table of Content 摘要I
    ABSTRACTII
    誌 謝III
    第一章 緒論1
    1.1 研究動機1
    1.2 研究目的3
    1.3 研究範圍及限制4
    1.4 主要名詞定義4
    1.5 研究流程及章節架構5
    1.6 章節架構7
    第二章 文獻回顧9
    2.1 永續發展9
    2.2 國內與永續發展相關制度15
    2.3 評鑑的定義與作法19
    2.4 永續公共工程29
    第三章研究設計39
    3.1 評鑑準則架構與研究假設39
    3.2 研究步驟41
    3.3 研究對象與工具42
    3.4 建立問卷與資料整理44
    3.5 統計分析45
    第四章 訂定公共工程評鑑準則55
    4.1 抽樣母體描述55
    4.2 預試問卷57
    4.3 正式問卷探索性因素分析64
    4.4 驗證性因素分析73
    4.5 模式之背景變項分析77
    4.6永續公共工程評鑑模式各準則說明及權重83
    4.7 永續評鑑架構比較88
    第五章 永續公共工程評鑑系統與操作驗證91
    5.1 永續公共工程評鑑系統說明91
    5.2 公共工程評鑑制度運作模式95
    第六章 結論與建議103
    6.1 結論103
    6.2 研究貢獻104
    6.3 建議105
    附錄1 預試問卷113
    附錄2 正式問卷119
    附錄3 利用GOOGLE帳號製作網路問卷程序134
    附錄 4 資料登錄至SPSS前製作之編碼表139
    附錄5 問卷模型A與模型B之相關係數141
    附錄6 結構方程模式計算結果145
    附錄7 二階計算成果及說明151
    Reference 1.WCED, Our common future: the Bruntland report. 1987, Oxford University Press from the World Commission on Environment and Development: New York. p. 8.
    2.Sitarz, D., Agenda 21: The earth summit strategy to save our planet. 1993: Earthpress.
    3.W.H.O., 2005 World Summit Outcome Document, 15 September 2005
    4.Wikipedia, "Green New Deal.". 25 Jan. 2010, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. .
    5.行政院公共工程委員會,工程倫理手冊, 2007: 臺北. p. 13.
    6.行政院公共工程委員會,永續公共工程-節能減碳政策白皮書, 2008.
    7.公共工程委員會,加強工程施工查核小組查核作業研討會座談紀錄,2006. 下載網址: http://www.pcc.gov.tw/pccap2/BIZSfront/upload/article/discussion_record.doc.
    8.Singh, RK., HR. Murty, SK. Gupta, and AK. Dikshit, An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 2009. 9(2): p. 189-212.
    9.Likert, R., A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 1932. 22 .(140): p. 55.
    10.維基百科編者,可持續發展, Wikipedia. 2010; 下載網址: http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E5%8F%AF%E6%8C%81%E7%BB%AD%E5%8F%91%E5%B1%95&oldid=12117451. .
    11.Munasinghe, M., Environmental economics and sustainable development. 1993: World Bank Publications.
    12.蕭代基,臺灣環境保護與永續發展的展望,,臺灣的未來學術研討會論文, 2002.
    13.Niemeijer, D. and R. de Groot, A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets. Ecological indicators, 2008. 8(1): p. 14-25.
    14.行政院永續發展委員會, 2007年國家永續發展年報, 2008.
    15.Niemeijer, D., Developing indicators for environmental policy: data-driven and theory-driven approaches examined by example. Environmental Science & Policy, 2002. 5(2): p. 91-103.
    16.葉欣誠、李育明、廖述良,以系統動態模型評估環境永續性指標,經濟成長與永續發展模型研討會: 系統動態與一般均衡方法之應用, 2005 國立中央大學臺灣經濟研究中心:中壢.
    17.Cole, R., Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods. Building Research & Information, 1998. 26(1): p. 3-16.
    18.Cole, R., Building environmental assessment methods: clarifying intentions. Building Research & Information, 1999. 27(4): p. 230-246.
    19.行政院永續發展委員會,九十八年國家永續發展獎選拔表揚要點, 2009.
    20.內政部建築研究所,綠建築解說與評估手冊, 2003.
    21.行政院公共工程委員會,公共工程金質獎頒發作業要點, 2009.
    22.陳素秋,臺灣近三十年來教育評鑑研究生論文分析,教育政策論壇, 2006. 9(3): p. 47-73.
    23.Scriven, M., The methodology of evaluation. Evaluating action programs. Readings in social action and education, 1972: p. 123-136.
    24.行政院公共工程委員會,公共工程品質管理訓練班教材第一冊, 2008.
    25.行政院公共工程委員會,工程施工查核小組作業辦法修正總說明, 2003.
    26.郭學書,公共工程規劃設計品質評鑑指標之研究, 2006.國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文.
    27.中華鋪面學會,公共工程全生命週期品質管理整體架構之研訂, 2009. 行政院公共工程委員會委託研究報告.
    28.交通部臺灣區國道新建工程局,技術顧問機構執行績效評鑑要點, 2003.
    29.臺北市政府,臺北市政府所屬各機關公共工程委託廠商辦理技術服務品質評鑑作業程序,1999.
    30.臺南縣政府,臺南縣政府公共工程技術服務廠商評鑑作業要點, 2005.
    31.范良,永續公共工程融入節能減碳. 營建知訊, 2009. 313期P. 1-5.
    32.Chern, J.-C. and T.C. Liu, Life-cycle management of sustainable public infrastructure. 2008: Taipei.
    33.行政院公共工程委員會,公共建設工程經費估算編列手冊總則, 1998.
    34.中央大學營建管理研究所,建立永續公共工程指標系統之研究, 2008, 行政院公共工程委員會委託研究報告.
    35.Ugwu, OO., MM. Kumaraswamy, A. Wong, and ST. Ng, Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP) Part 1. Development of indicators and computational methods. Automation in construction, 2006. 15(2): p. 239-251.
    36.Sahely, H.R., C.A. Kennedy, and B.J. Adams, Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems. Canada Journal Civil Engineering, 2005. 32: p. 72-85.
    37.Ding, G.K.C., Sustainable construction--The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008. 86(3): p. 451-464.
    38.Dasgupta, S. and E.K.L. Tam, Indicators and framework for assessing sustainable infrastructure. Canada Journal Civil Engineering, 2005. 32: p. 30-44.
    39.Ugwu, OO., MM. Kumaraswamy, A. Wong, and ST. Ng, Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP): Part 2: A case study in bridge design. Automation in construction, 2006. 15(2): p. 229-238.
    40.Kaplowitz, M., T. Hadlock, and R. Levine, A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public opinion quarterly, 2004. 68(1): p. 94-101.
    41.李政忠,網路調查所面臨的問題與解決建議,資訊社會研究, 2004: p. 1-24.
    42.Dillman, DA., G. Phelps, R. Tortora, K. Swift, J. Kohrell, J. Berck, and BL. Messer, Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet. Social Science Research, 2009. 38(1): p. 1-18.
    43.Leece, P., M. Bhandari, S. Sprague, MF. Swiontkowski, EH. Schemitsch, P. Tornetta III, PJ. Devereaux, and GH. Guyatt, Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a randomized comparison (2). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2004. 6(3):e(30).
    44.余民寧、李仁豪,調查方式與問卷長短對回收率與調查內容影響之研究,當代教育研究季刊, 2006. 14(3): p. 127-168.
    45.Barrios, M., A. Villarroya, A. Borrego, and C. Olle, Response Rates and Data Quality in Web and Mail Surveys Administered to PhD Holders. Social Science Computer Review, 2010.
    46.Google文件說明,下載網址: http://docs.google.com/support/bin/topic.py?hl=b5&topic=15114.
    47.Moore, D. and L. Sorenson, Introduction to the Practice of Statistics SPSS Manual. 2005: WH Freeman.
    48.吳明隆, SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計, 2003.知城數位科技.
    49.邱皓政,量化研究法 (二):統計原理與分析技術, 2005.雙葉書廊有限公司.
    50.吳明隆, SPSS 操作與應用:變異數分析實務, 2007.五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
    51.Joreskog, K., Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables using LISREL. Retrieved August, 2002. 3: p. 2008.
    52.邱皓政,結構方程模式: LISREL的理論、技術與應用, 2003.雙葉書廊有限公司.
    53.楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園,社會及行為科學研究法, 1989.東華書局.
    54.蕭文龍,多變量分析最佳入門實用書, 2007.眳p資訊.
    55.Steiger, J. and J. Lind. Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. in The annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. 1980. Iowa city.
    56.Cronbach, L., Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 1951. 16(3): p. 297-334.
    57.邱皓政,量化研究與統計分析, 2007.五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
    58.Spearman, C., " General Intelligence," Objectively Determined and Measured. The American journal of psychology, 1904. 15(2): p. 201-292.
    59.張益誠,應用因子分析方法為臺灣地區建構永續發展趨勢評估指標系統, 2001.臺灣大學博士論文.
    60.Bottero, M. and G. Mondini, An appraisal of analytic network process and its role in sustainability assessment in Northern Italy. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 2008. 19(6): p. 642-660.
    61.Huang, RY., CT. Huang, H. Lin, and WH. Ku, Factor analysis of interface problems among construction parties —a case study of MRT. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2008. 16(1): p. 52-63.
    62.Shieh, HM. and KY. Wu, The relationship between total quality management and project performance in building planning phase: an empirical study of real estate industries in Taiwan. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2002. 13(1): p. 133-151.
    63.Chen, Y., G. Okudan, and D. Riley, Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings. Automation in Construction, 2009. 19(2): p. 235-244
    64.陳正昌、程炳林, SPSS、SAS、BMDP統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用(二版),1998: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
    65.Mulaik, SA., LR. James, J. Van Alstine, N. Bennett, S. Lind, and CD. Stilwell, Quantitative methods in psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 1989. 105(3): p. 430-445.
    66.Pison, G., PJ. Rousseeuw, P. Filzmoser, and C. Croux, Robust factor analysis. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 2003. 84(1): p. 145-172.
    67.Widaman, K., Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: Differential bias in representing model parameters? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1993. 28(3): p. 263-311.
    68.黃財尉,共同因素分析與主成份分析之比較,彰化師大輔導學報, 2003. 25: p. 63-86.
    69.Costello, A. and J. Osborne, Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2005. 10(7): p. 1-9.
    70.Treiblmaier, H. and P. Filzmoser, Exploratory factor analysis revisited: How robust methods support the detection of hidden multivariate data structures in IS research. 2009.
    71.陳順宇,多變量分析 (三版), 2004.華泰書局
    72.黃芳銘,結構方程模式理論與應用, 2002.五南書局.
    73.Yang, JB. and SF. Ou, Using structural equation modeling to analyze relationships among key causes of delay in construction. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2008. 35(4): p. 321-332.
    74.戚淑芳,工程爭議之有效管理. 2005,成功大學碩士論文.
    75.陳棟燦,營建專案夥伴關係結構方程模式建構與驗證之研究, 2006,雲林科技大學博士論文
    76.Chin, W., Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 1998. 22(1): p. 7-16.
    77.Hair, JF., RE. Anderson, RL. Tatham, and WC. Black, Multivariate analysis. Englewood: Prentice Hall International, 1998.
    78.徐聖訓, LISREL 新手入門:在結構方程模式的應用, 2009: 滄海書局.
    79.Fornell, C. and F. Bookstein, Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 1982. 19(4): p. 440-452.
    80.Wheaton, B., B. Muthen, DF. Alwin, and GF. Summers, Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological methodology, 1977. 8: p. 84-136.
    81.Bentler, P., Confirmatory factor analysis via noniterative estimation: A fast, inexpensive method. Journal of Marketing Research, 1982. 19(4): p. 417-424.
    82.Bentler, P. and D. Bonett, Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980. 88(3): p. 588-606.
    83.Hu, L. and P. Bentler, Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999. 6(1): p. 1-55.
    84.Citak, G., Constructing an Attitude Scale: Attitudes toward Violence on Televisions. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2009. 4(4).
    85.朱達仁、陳弘成、郭一羽、鄭安盛、方偉達、施君翰,一個溪流生態環境綜合性評估模式之權重估計,地理學報, 2009. 55: p. 65-95.
    86.余泰魁、黃識銘,供應商銷售人員工作滿意量表之建構,人力資源管理學報, 2005. 5(3): p. 49-74.
    87.Aydin, S. and G. Ozer, National customer satisfaction indices: an implementation in the Turkish mobile telephone market. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 2005. 23(5): p. 486-504.
    88.Park, Y., P. Heo, and M. Rim, Measurement of a Customer Satisfaction Index for Improvement of Mobile RFID Services in Korea. ETRI journal, 2008. 30(5): p. 634-643.
    89.行政院公共工程委員會,工程顧問服務業98年度業務統計分析暨網頁內容更新計畫, 2010.
    90.行政院公共工程委員會令,機關委託技術服務廠商評選及計費辦法, 2010.
    91.故鄉市場調查股份有限公司, 97年度營造業經濟概況調查報告,內政部營建署委託, 2009.
    92.Aly, H. and J. Duboff, Statistical vs. Judgment Sampling: An Empirical Study of Auditing the Accounts Receivable of a Small Retail Store. Accounting Review, 1971. 46(1): p. 119-128.
    93.趙琪、許耿皓,產品線延伸策略在零售通路之績效,管理學報, 2003. 20(6): p. 1159-1174.
    94.Debrah, Y. and G. Ofori, Human resource development of professionals in an emerging economy: the case of the Tanzanian construction industry. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2006. 17(3): p. 440-463.
    95.Kline, P., An easy guide to factor analysis. 1994: Routledge.
    96.徐億君, 「文化治理」中的不對等權力關係—以桃園縣客家文化館為例, 2009. 中央大學客家社會文化研究所碩士論文.
    97.呂世通,政府採購委託技術服務廠商評選決策模式之研究, 2004. 中央大學土木工程研究所博士論文
    98.行政院公共工程委員會永續公共工程網頁,永續公共工程案例,下載網址:http://eem.pcc.gov.tw/eem/taxonomy/term/137.臺灣環境資訊協會網頁維護
    99.Herzog, S. and R. Hertwig, The wisdom of many in one mind: Improving individual judgments with dialectical bootstrapping. Psychological Science, 2009. 20(2): p. 231-237.
    100.Mannes, A., Are We Wise About the Wisdom of Crowds? The Use of Group Judgments in Belief Revision. Management Science, 2009. 55(8): p. 1267-1279.
    101.立法院議案關係文書,土木建設法草案,院總第1470號委員提案第8626號, 2008.
    Advisor
  • Zhi-Dong Lin(林志棟)
  • Files
  • 973402009.pdf
  • approve immediately
    Date of Submission 2010-08-16

    [Back to Results | New Search]


    Browse | Search All Available ETDs

    If you have dissertation-related questions, please contact with the NCU library extension service section.
    Our service phone is (03)422-7151 Ext. 57407,E-mail is also welcomed.