Title page for 92436013


[Back to Results | New Search]

Student Number 92436013
Author James Peng(彭永強)
Author's Email Address No Public.
Statistics This thesis had been viewed 1849 times. Download 10 times.
Department Graduate Institute of Industrial Management
Year 2005
Semester 2
Degree Master
Type of Document Master's Thesis
Language zh-TW.Big5 Chinese
Title 台灣光電產業供應鏈管理之供應商評選要素探討---以台灣康寧公司為例
Date of Defense 2006-06-29
Page Count 107
Keyword
  • AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process)
  • Global Supply Chain Management
  • Supplier evaluations
  • Abstract The academic goal of this research is to develop a global supplier evaluation system while Taiwan Corning Display Glass Co., Ltd. (hereafter referred to as Taiwan Corning) is probing into the management of global supply chain. What are the key evaluating elements? What are the ratings of these elements? What are differences while evaluating the domestic and supplier abroad? 
    This research first looked for key measuring elements via relevant documents and then referred to professional accomplishment and abundant experience of the industry experts. Carrying on the selection of constructing surface and key evaluation element. Finally, by the questionnaire to those high-ordered administrator participants in supplier's evaluating by AHP(Analytical Hierarchy Process), simplifying the complicated evaluation process into alimented grade to calculate the relative weight among the key elements and to list the priority of key elements side by side.
    The results show under the management of global supply chain, the top eight key evaluated element to domestic suppliers of Taiwan Coning as follows: (1) Manufacture ability (2) Quality consistency (3) Offering of the lowest price (4) Delivery in consistency (5) Ability to improve continuously (6) Transport cost (7) After-sale service  (8) Product liability. And the eight major key elements to the foreign supplier evaluates in order: (1) Transport cost (2) Quality consistency (3) Manufacture ability (4) Delivery in consistency (5) Ability to improve continuously (6) Offering of the lowest price (7) Exchange rate (8) Product liability.
    This research provided an evaluation method while choosing the supplier of Taiwan Corning via getting more objective and quantized information to analyze the Good or bad supplier. In the face of the internationalized competition, this method can also be regarded as the reference of building global supply chain, since it evaluates the complicated process of supplier choosing into a concise and efficient way.
    Table of Content 第一章 緒論.................................................................................................1
    第一節 研究背景................................................................................1
    第二節 研究動機................................................................................3
    第三節 研究目的................................................................................4
    第四節 研究流程................................................................................5
    第二章 文獻探討.........................................................................................7
    第一節 全球供應鏈管理.......................................................................7
    第二節 供應商評選.............................................................................16
    第三節 分析層級程序法.....................................................................23
    第三章 研究設計與方法............................................................................30
    第一節 研究架構.................................................................................30
    第二節 供應商評選之要素設計.........................................................32
    第三節 研究方法.................................................................................35
    第四章 研究分析.......................................................................................45
    第一節 專家意見問卷調查..............................................................45
    第二節 分析層級程序法問卷.............................................................53
    第三節 實證訪談.................................................................................69
    第五章 結論與建議...................................................................................73
    第一節 結論.........................................................................................73
    第二節 貢獻.........................................................................................75
    第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議.....................................................81
    參考文獻.....................................................................................................83
    附錄 … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … 88
    附錄 一 前測問卷… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … 88
    附錄 二 AHP問卷… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … 94
    Reference 中文部分
    1. 李啟彰(1995.6),「供應鏈管理概念模式建構研究─DRP/MRPII之整合資訊策略」,國立台灣大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。
    2. 徐村和、粘淑惠(1997),「交談式模糊決策輔助系統-以大眾運輸系統營運方式選擇為例」,運輸學刊,第10卷第4期,pp.79-96。
    3. 陳怡和(1998),「供應商管理標竿之建立與分析— 以台灣筆記型電腦產業為例」,元智大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。
    4. 陳順宇(1998),「多變量分析」,華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
    5. 陳慈暉(1998.10),「全球供應鏈管理」,能力雜誌,第36-39頁。
    6. 陳家祥、許吉男、張厚瑩(1999),「台灣零售通路供應鏈管理應用特性與展望」,1999國際物流研討會論文集,第144-151頁。
    7. 陳曉琪(2001.6),「供應商遴選之決策支援系統之研究」,義守大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。
    8. 許政傑(1997),「全球供應鏈管理策略之研究— 以台灣電腦業為例」.國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    9. 曾國雄、鄧振源(1989),「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上)」,中國統計學報,第27卷第6期,pp.5-22。
    10.黃子賢(1997),「供應商遴選模式之建立」,國立雲林技術學院工業管理技術系國科會大學生參與專題研究計畫成果報告。
    11.黃智偉(2000),「供應鏈管理下供應商選擇評估之研究─以台灣地區中衛體系之汽機車業與電腦資訊業為例」,國立雲林科技大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文。
    12.黃振廷(2002),「利用分析層級程序法探討台灣中草藥製造業之成功關鍵因素」,國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
    13.蘇雄義(1998.6),「企業物流導論」,華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
    14.徐村和, 楊宗欣 (1999)「 媒體選擇影響因素之研究—習慣領域及灰色理論」,
    東吳經濟商學學報,24 期:115~138.
    15.刁根薰 ( 1993 ),競賽式決策制定法—AHP 入門, 台北, 建宏出版社
    16.林國勝 ( 2000 ),「AHP 標度評價與新標度法之研究」國防管理學院國防決策科學研究所碩士論文
    英文部分
    1. Al-Faraj, T.N., Alidi, A.S. and Al- Zayer, J.a., (1993), “Vendors Selection Via Spreadsheet Analytical Hierarchy Process”, Computer and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 1-4, pp.65-68.
    2. Chaudhry, S. S., Forst, F. G., and Zydiak, J. L. (1993), “Vendor Selection With Price Breaks”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp.52-56.
    3. Choi, T. Y., Hartley, J. L. (1996), “An Explortation of Supplier Selection Practices Across the Supply Chain”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 14, pp.333-343.
    4. Collins Tony (1999), “Striking it big together, Supply Management”, Vol 4, Iss 18, pp.28-30.
    5. Goffin, K., Szwejczewski, M. and New, C. (1997), “Managing Suppliers : When Fewer Can Mean More”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 27, No. 7, pp.422-436.
    6. Houshyar, A. and David, L. (1992), “A Systematic Selection Procedure”, Computer and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 1-4, pp.173-176.
    7. Johnson, James C. and Wood, Donald F. (1996), “Contemporary Logistics”, 6th Edition.
    8. Kalakota Ravi and Whinston Andrew (1985), “Electronic commerce: a management guild”, Wesley Longman.
    9. Mohanty, R. P. and Deshmukh, S. G. (1993), “Using of Analytic Hierarchic Process for Evaluating Sources of Supply”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp.22-28.
    10. Nydick, R. L. and Hill, R. P. (1992), “Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Structure the Supplier Selection Procedure”, International Journal of Purchasing
    and Materials Management, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp.31-36.
    11. Pearson, J.N., Ellram, L.M., (1995), “Supplier Selection and Evaluation in Small
    versus Large Electronics Firms”, Journal of Small Business Management, Octorber.
    12. Philippe-Pierre Dornier, Ricardo Ernst, Michel Fender and Panos Kouvelis, “Global Operations and Logistics”, N. Y.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp.214-231, pp.383-423.
    13. Porter, Michael E. (1985), “Competitive Advantage”, New York, N. Y.: The Free Press, pp.122.
    14. Rohit Verma, Madeleine E. Pullman (1998), “An analysis of supplier selection
    process”, Omega, Int. J. Mgmt Sci. Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 739-750.
    15. Ross David F. (1997), “Competing through Supply Chain Management: Creating Market-Winning Strategies Through Supply Chain Partnerships”, London: Chapman & Hall.
    16. Saaty, T. L. (1980), “The Analysis Hierarchy Process”, New York:McGraw
    Hill.
    17. Sherman Richard J. (1998), “Supply Chain Management for the Millennium”,
    Oak Brook, IL: Warehousing Education and Research Council.
    18. Smytka, D.L., Clemens, M.W. (1993), “Total Cost Suppliers Selection Model:
    A Case Study”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management,
    Vol. 29, No. 1, pp.42-49.
    19. Thompson, K. N. (1990), “Vendor Profile Analysis”, Journal of Purchasing and
    Materials Management, Vol. 26, Iss. 1, pp.11-19.
    20. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R. and Benton, W.C. (1991), “Vendor Selection Criteria
    and Methods”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp.2-18.
    21. Wilson, E. J. (1994), “The Relative Importance of Suppliers Selection Criteria:
    A Review and Update”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp.35-41.
    22. Zahedi, F. (1986), “The Analytic Hierarchy Process-A Survey of The Method and Its Applications”, Interfaces, pp96-108.
    Advisor
  • Hsing-Pei Kao(高信培)
  • Files
  • 92436013.pdf
  • disapprove authorization
    Date of Submission 2006-07-18

    [Back to Results | New Search]


    Browse | Search All Available ETDs

    If you have dissertation-related questions, please contact with the NCU library extension service section.
    Our service phone is (03)422-7151 Ext. 57407,E-mail is also welcomed.