Title page for 88423032


[Back to Results | New Search]

Student Number 88423032
Author Chia-Hung Weng(翁嘉鴻)
Author's Email Address No Public.
Statistics This thesis had been viewed 2771 times. Download 2158 times.
Department Information Management
Year 2000
Semester 2
Degree Master
Type of Document Master's Thesis
Language zh-TW.Big5 Chinese
Title 以認知負荷觀點探討聽覺媒體物件之媒體呈現方式對學習成效之影響
Date of Defense 2001-06-19
Page Count 85
Keyword
  • cognitive load
  • modality effect
  • redundancy effect
  • Abstract none
    Table of Content 目錄I
    圖目錄III
    表目錄IV
    第壹章 緒論1
    第一節 研究背景及動機1
    第二節 研究目的4
    第三節 研究範圍4
    第四節 預期貢獻5
    第五節 研究程序5
    第六節 論文結構6
    第貳章 文獻探討8
    第一節 多媒體及媒體物件8
    第二節 訊息處理學習理論13
    第三節 認知負荷理論16
    第四節 其他多媒體理論30
    第參章 研究方法35
    第一節 研究架構35
    第二節 研究方法之選擇37
    第三節 變項的定義與操作化38
    第四節 研究命題40
    第五節 實驗設計46
    第肆章 資料分析54
    第一節 樣本基本資料分析54
    第二節 統計方法55
    第三節 研究假說之檢定57
    第四節 教學效能比較68
    第五節 研究發現72
    第伍章 結論與建議74
    第一節 研究結論74
    第二節 對實務的建議75
    第三節 研究貢獻76
    第四節 研究限制77
    第五節 後續研究建議78
    參考文獻81
    附錄一 研究問卷A1-1
    一、先備知識測驗暨聽覺偏好量表A1-1
    二、學習成效測驗(低資訊量)A1-2
    三、學習成效測驗(高資訊量)A1-3
    附錄二 實驗系統A2-1
    Reference 中文部分
    1.張春興(民85),「教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐」,台北市,台灣東華書局。
    2.張玉燕(民83),「教學媒體」,台北市,五南圖書出版公司。
    3.張傳英(民89),「台灣的兩棲類」,台北,嘉利博資訊出版。
    4.羅綸新(民83),「多媒體設計」,台北市,松崗圖書出版社。
    5.國立自然科學博物館(民88),「認識我們,愛護我們:台灣樹蛙與金門鳥類的呼喚」,台中巿,國立自然科學博物館。
    6.宋曜廷(民89),「先前知識、文章結構與多媒體呈現對文章學習的影響」,國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系未出版博士論文。
    7.李宜珍(民82),「談高效應的多媒體介面設計」,中華民國八十一年國際視聽教育學術研討會論文集,265-271頁。
    8.李勝富、房思平(民85),「資訊時代的教學新模式,美國教育新知選輯」,192-200頁。
    9.洪昭榮、劉明洲(民86),「影響多媒體電腦輔助學習認知因素之探討」,教育研究資訊,5(4),119-125頁。
    10.施郁芬(民85),「多媒體課程軟體中語音和文字的使用及教學效果」,視聽教育雙月刊,38卷,第3期,5-15頁。
    11.徐文杰、金承慧(民89),「多媒體內容的應用與展望」,電子品與圖書館學術研討會論文集,103-126頁。
    12.許惠卿(民84),「漫談多媒體與超媒體CAI」,CAI課程軟體編製技術參考手冊,教育電子計算機中心發行。
    13.黃克文(民85),「認知負荷與個人特質及學習成就之關聯」,國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
    14.陳彙芳、范懿文(民89),「認知負荷對多媒體電腦輔助學習成效之影響研究」,資訊管理研究,第2卷,第2期,45-60頁。
    15.羅綸新(民84),「多媒體輔助學習中旁白與文字解釋對生物學習之影響」,國科會計畫。
    16.青蛙小站,http://www.froghome.com.tw (資料取得時間:2000年10月5日)。
    1.Baddeley, A. (1992). “Working Memory,” Science, 255, 556-559.
    2.Betrancourt, M., & Bisseret, A. (1998). “Integrating Textual and Pictorial Information Via Pop-up Windows:an Experimental Study,” Behaviour & Information Technology, 17(5), 263-273.
    3.Bobis, J., Sweller, J., & Cooper, M. (1993). “Cognitive Load Effects in a Primary-School Geometry Task,” Learning & Instruction, 3, 1-21.
    4.Cerpa, N., Chandler, P. & Sweller, P. (1996). “Some Conditions Under Which Integrated Computer-Based Training Software Can Facilitate Learning,” Journal of Educational Research, 15(4), 345-367.
    5.Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1991). “Cognitive Load Theory and The Format of Instruction,” Cognitive and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
    6.Dobios, M. & Vial, I. (2000) “Multimedia design: The effects of Relating multimodel Information,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 157-165.
    7.Gopher, D. & Braune, R. (1984). “On the Psychophysics of workload: Why bother with subjective measures?” Human Factoe, 26, 519-532.
    8.Hartley, K. W. (1999). “Media Overload in Instructional Web Pages and the Impact on Learning,” Educational Media International, 36(2), 145-150.
    9.Hendy, C. H., Hamilton, K. M. & Landry, L. N. (1993). “Measuring subjective workload: When is one scale better than many?” Human factor, 35, 579-601.
    10.Iding, M. K. (2000). “Is Seeing Believing? Features of Effective Multimedia for Learning Science,” International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(4), 403-415.
    11.Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). “Managing Split-Attention and Redundancy in Multimedia Instruction,” Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351-371.
    12.Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). “Incorporating Learning Experience Into the Design of Multimedia Instruction,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 126-136.
    13.Kerr, B. (1999). “Effective Use of Audio Media in Multimedia Presentations,” in:Proceedings of the Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference, ERIC#: ED436121.
    14.Koroghlanian, C. M. & Sullivan, H.J. (2000). “Audio and Text Density in Computer-based Instruction,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(2), 217-230.
    15.Lai, S. L. (2000). “Influence of Audio-Visual Presentations on Learning Abstract Concepts,” Int’l of Instructional Media, 27(2), 199-206.
    16.Large, A., Beheshti, J., Breuleux, A. & Renaud, A. (1994). “Multimedia and Comprehension: A Cognitive Study,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(7), 515-528.
    17.Marcus, N., Cooper, M. & Sweller, J. (1996). ” Understanding Instructions,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 49-63.
    18.Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). ”For Whom is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Extensions of a Dual Coding Theory of Multimedia Learning, ” Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389-401.
    19.Mayer, R. E. (1996). “Multimedia Learning: Are We Asking The Right Questions?” Educational Psychologist, 3(3), 147-165.
    20.Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., & Tapangco, L. (1996). “When Less Is More:Meaningful Learning From Visual and Verbal Summaries of Science Textbook Lessons,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 64-73.
    21.Mayer, R. E. (1997). “Multimedia Learning: Are We Asking the Right Questions,” Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19.
    22.Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (1998). ”A Split Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing System in Working Memory,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312-320.
    23.Mayer, R. E., Moreno, R., Boire, M., & Vagge, S. (1999). “Maximizing Constructivist Learning From Multimedia Communications by Minimizing Cognitive Load,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 638-643.
    24.Miller, P. H. (1983). “The Magic seven, plus or minus two: Some limit on our capacity to process information,” Psychological Review, 63, 81-87.
    25.Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). “Cognitive Prnciples of Multimedia Learning:The Role of Modality and Contiguity,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358-368.
    26.Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). “A Coherence Effect in Multimedia Learning:The Case for Minimizing Irrelevant Sounds in the Design of Multimedia Instructional Messages,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 117-125.
    27.Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R. & Sweller, J. (1995). ”Reducing Cognitive Load by Mixing Auditory and Visual Presentation Modes,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 319-334.
    28.Najjar, L. J. (1998). “Principles of Educational Multimedia User Interface Design,” Human Factors, 40(2), 311-323.
    29.Niderhauser, D. S., Reynods, R. E., Salmen, D. J. & Skolmoski, P. (2000). “The Influence of Cogitive Load on Learning From Hypertext,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(3), 237-255.
    30.Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
    31.Park, I., & Hannafin, M. J. (1993). “Empirically-Based Guidelines for the Design of Interactive Multimedia,” Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, 63-85.
    32.Pass, F. G. W. C. (1992). “Training Strategies for Attaining Transfer of Problem-Solving Skill in Statistics:A Cognitive Load Approach,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429-434.
    33.Pass, F. G. W. C., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (1994). “Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122-133.
    34.Penney, C. G. (1989) “Modality Effects and the Structure of Short-Term Verbal Memory,” Memory & Cognitive, 17(4), 398-422.
    35.Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (1998). “Supporting Visual and Verbal Learning Preferences in a Second-Language Multimedia Learning Environment,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 25-36.
    36.Rowntree, D. (1994). “Teaching with Audio in Open and Distance Learning: An Audio-print Package for Teachers and Trainers,” London: Kogan Page, 10-12, 15-16.
    37.Simon, H. A. (1974). “How big is a chunk? ” Science, 183, 482-488.
    38.Sweller, J. (1988). “Cognitive Load During Problem Solving : Effects on Learning,” Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
    39.Sweller, J. (1989). “Cognitive Technology: Some Procedures for Facilitating Learning and Problem Solving in Mathematics and Science,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 457-466.
    40.Sweller, J. (1990). “On the Limited Evidence for The Strategies,” Journal for Research in Mathematice Education, 21(5), 411-415.
    41.Sweller, J. & Chandler, P. (1994). “Why Some Material is Difficult to Learn,” Cognition and Instruction, 12(3), 185-233.
    42.Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). “Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design,” Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-285.
    43.Tiene, D. (2000). “Sensory Mode and ‘Information Load’: Examining The Effects of Timing on Multisensory Processing,” International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(2), 183-198.
    44.Tindall-ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). “When 2 Sensory Modes are Better Than One,” Journal of Experimental Psychology.Applied, 3(4), 257-287.
    45.Tuovinen, J. E. & Sweller, J. (1999). “A Comparison of Cognitive Load Associated With Discovery Learning and Worked Examples,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 334-341.
    46.Van Gervan, P. W. H., Paas, F. G. W. C., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. & Schmidt, H. G. (2000). “Cognitive Load Theory and The Acquistion of Complex Cognitive Skills in the Elderly: Towards an Integrative Framework,” Educational Gerontology, 26(6), 503-521.
    47.Wierwille, W. W. & Egg meier, F. L. (1993). “ Recommendations for Mental Workload Measurement in a Test and Evaluation Environment,” Human Factor, 35, 263-281.
    48.Yeung, A. S., Jin, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). “Cognitive Load and Learner Expertise:Split-Attention and Redndancy Effects in Reading with Explanatory Notes,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 1-21.
    49.Yeung, A. S. (1999). “Cognitive Load and Learner Expertise: Split Attention and Redundancy Effects in Reading Comprehension Tasks With Vocabulary Definitions,” The Journal of Experiment Education, 67(3), 197-217.
    50.Zettl, H. (1999). Sight Sound Motion, Applied Media Aesthetics. San Francisco: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
    Advisor
  • Yi-Wen Fan(范懿文)
  • Files
  • 88423032.pdf
  • approve immediately
    Date of Submission 2001-06-19

    [Back to Results | New Search]


    Browse | Search All Available ETDs

    If you have dissertation-related questions, please contact with the NCU library extension service section.
    Our service phone is (03)422-7151 Ext. 57407,E-mail is also welcomed.