Title page for 87124002


[Back to Results | New Search]

Student Number 87124002
Author Yu-Chen Kao(高宇成)
Author's Email Address No Public.
Statistics This thesis had been viewed 2698 times. Download 1751 times.
Department Graduate Institute of Philosophy
Year 2005
Semester 1
Degree Master
Type of Document Master's Thesis
Language zh-TW.Big5 Chinese
Title 隱私(權)議題中化約主義與功能主義之探究
Date of Defense 2006-01-10
Page Count 211
Keyword
  • access
  • constitutional law
  • diginity
  • functionalism
  • human relationship
  • individuality
  • personhood
  • privacy
  • reductionism
  • self-consciousness
  • self-reflexivity
  • social culture convention
  • the inviolate personality
  • the right over the person
  • the right to privacy
  • tort law
  • Abstract 本文的主旨在於深入探討現代社會中「隱私(權)」議題的哲學性論述,所謂「隱私(權)」議題,即是包含「隱私」和「隱私權」兩個概念的議題,上述兩種概念雖然不是完全相等的概念,但卻有著密不可分的關係。
    在「隱私(權)」的哲學性論述上,「化約主義」與「功能主義」是極為重要的
    兩種不同主張,這兩種論述幾乎針鋒相對的原因在於:目前對於「隱私」和「隱私
    權」概念的定義都是有缺漏的;此外這兩種主義深受美國「憲法」與「侵權法」的
    法律背景影響,而採取兩個不同的法律立場來論述。
    除了深入探討這兩種主義的論證之外,本文也經由這兩種主義的對話,進一步
    瞭解、比較兩者的關係;並且本文要透過現代社會中已經漸漸產生變化的「隱私(權)」內涵來進一步評估這兩者未來對「隱私(權)」詮釋的發展性與可能面臨的問題。
    本文在「隱私(權)」議題上所得到的結論,或許與一般人的直覺或大多數學者
    的功能主義觀點不同,但是卻更多考慮到現代社會中「隱私(權)」內涵的變化,期待能為「隱私(權)」議題,提供一個更新的哲學性論述思考方向。
    Table of Content 目錄…………………………………………………………...Ⅰ
    第一章序論…………………………………………………1
      前言………………………………………………………..1
    第一節本文架構…………………………………………6
    第二節問題源起與問題意識…………………………..13
    第三節文獻探討………………………………………..19
    第二章隱私(權)的化約主義論述……………………..62
    第一節隱私沒有普遍性準則…………………………..67
    第二節隱私的負面影響………………………………..75
    第三節以新權利取代隱私權…………………………..85
    第四節透明社會的方向………………………………108
    第三章隱私(權)的功能主義論述……………………124
    第一節人格保障理論…………………………………127
    第二節人格促進理論…………………………………140
    第三節人際關係理論…………………………………153
    第四節隱私(權)的其它功能性……………………163
    第四章結論………………………………………………170
    第一節隱私(權)內涵的變化………………………174
    第二節以隱私(權)新內涵評估化約主義與功能主義之發展性…………………………………………186
    第三節總結……………………………………………200
    參考書目……………………………………………………207
    Reference 引用資料:
    Alfino, Mark, and Mayes, G. Randolph. “Reconstructing the Right to Privacy.” Social Theory and Practice. 29.1 (2003): 1-18
    Allen, Anita L. Uneasy Access. New Jersey:Rowman&Littlefield, Publishers, 1988.
    Benn, Stanley I. “Privacy, Freedom, and Respect for Person.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. by Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 223-244
    Bloustein, Edward J. “Privacy as An Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answer to Dean Prosser.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. by Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 156-202
    Boling, Patricia. Privacy And the Politics of Intimate Life. Ithaca, N.Y.:Cornell University Press, 1996.
    Brin, David. The Transparent Society:Will Technology Force Us to Choose between Privacy and Freedom?. Addison-Wesiey:Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc., 1998.
    Bronski, Michael. The Pleasure Principle. New York:St. Martin’s Press, 1998.
    Castiglione, Robert I. “Paul, Weiss-Privacy the Rediscovery of Human Being” Philosophy Today 28(1984): 20-35
    Coleman, Craig Stuart. Privacy And Property: A Reexamination of The Right to Private Property. Madison: Thesis(Ph.D), The University of Wisconsin, 2000.
    Cooke, Maeve. ”A Space of One's Own: Autonomy, Privacy, Liberty.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 25.1 (1999): 23-53
    Engstrom, Timothy H. “Corporate Appropriation of Privacy: The Transformation of the Personal and Public Spheres.” Ethics and Behavior 7.3 (1997): 239-252
    Etzioni, Amitai. “Medical Records: Enhancing Privacy, Preserving the Common Good” Hastings-Center-Report 29.2 Mr-Ap (1999): 14-23
    Fried, Charles. “Privacy.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 203-222
    Gavison, Ruth. “Privacy and The Limits of Law.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 346-402
    Gerber, Scott D. “Privacy and Constitutional Theory.” Social Philosophy and Policy 17.2 (2000): 165-185
    Gerstein, Robert S. “Intimacy and Privacy.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 265-271
    Giddens, Anthony. Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge:Polity Press, 1991.
    Hasian, Marouf Jr. ”Vernacular legal discourse: Revisiting the public acceptance of the "right to privacy" in the 1960s.” Political Communication 18.1 (2001): 89-105
    Inness, Julie C. Privacy Intimacy And Isolation. New York:Oxford University Press, 1992.
    Johnson, Jeffery L. ”A Theory of the Nature and Value of Privacy.” Public Affairs Quarterly 6.3 (1992): 271-288
    Johnson, Jeffery L. “Constitutional Privacy.” Law and Philosophy 13.2 (1994): 161-193
    Posner, Richard A. “An Economic Theory of Privacy.” Ed. by Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 333-345
    Prosser, William L. ” Privacy.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology.
    Ed. by Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
    104-155
    Rachels, James. “Why Privacy Is Important.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy:
    An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University
    Press, 1984. 290-299
    Reiman, Jeffrey H. “Privacy, Intimacy, and Personhood.” Philosophical Dimensions
    of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. by Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge:
    Cambridge University Press, 1984. 300-316
    Schoeman, Fredinand David. Ed. Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1984. 
    •••. Privacy And Social Freedom. Cambridge; New York, NY, USA:Cambridge University Press, 1992 .
    Soifer, Eldon and Szabados, Bela. “Hypocrisy and Privacy.” Journal of Philosophical Research 27 (2002): 601-618
    Thomson, Judith Jarvis. ”The Right to Privacy.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 272-289
    Warren, Samuel D., and Louis D. Brandeis. ” The Right to Privacy.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 75-103
    Wasserstrom, Richard A. ” Privacy:Some Arguments and Assumptions.”
    Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand
    D.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 317-332
    Westin, Alan F. Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum press. 1967
    甯應斌 “性工作與現代性:現代自我的社會條件” 臺灣社會研究 53(2004):85-143
    劉靜怡 “網路社會的資訊隱私權保護” 二十一世紀 63(2001.02):17-27
    參考資料:
    Allen, Anita L. “Privacy in American Law.” Privacies: Philosophical Evaluations. Ed. by Rossler, Beate. Stanford:Stanford University Press, 2004. 19-39
    •••. ”Why Privacy Isn't Everything: Feminist Reflections on Personal.” Philosophy in Review 24.1 (2004): 1-3
    Beauchamp, Tom L. “The Right to Privacy and The Right to Die.” Social Philosophy and Policy 17.2 (2002): 276-292
    Chambers, Jean E. ”Privacy, Sex, and Norms: An Indirect Control Definition.”
      Journal of Information Ethics 9.1 (2000): 10-25
    Corlett, J. Angelo. “The Nature and Value of the Moral Right to Privacy.” Public Affairs Quarterly 16.4 (2002): 329-350
    Davison, Scott A. “Privacy and Control.” Faith and Philosophy 14.2 (1997): 137-151
    Epstein, Richard A. “Deconstructing Privacy: And Putting It Back Together Again.” Social Philosophy and Policy 17.2 (2000): 1-24
    Frey, R. G. ”Privacy, Control, and Talk of Rights.” Social Philosophy and Policy 17.2 (2002): 45-67
    Halper, Thomas ”Privacy and Autonomy: From Warren and Brandeis to Roe and Cruzan.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21.2 (1996): 121-135
    Hixon, Richard F. Privacy In A Public Society:Human Rights In Conflict. New York:Oxford University Press, 1987.
    LoPucki, L. M. “Did privacy cause identity theft?” Hastings Law Journal 54.4 (2003): 1277-1297
    Marshall, Sandra E. “Public Bodies, Private Selves.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 5 (1988): 147-158
    Moore, Banmgton. Privacy: Studies In Social And Cultural History. New York:Distributed by Pantheon Books, 1984.
    Robison, Wade L. ”Privacy and Personal Identity.” Ethics and Behavior 7.3 (1997):
    195-205
    Rosenberg, Alexander. “Privacy as a Matter of Taste and Rights.” Social Philosophy
    And Policy; 17.2 (2000): 68-90
    Staples, William G. The Culture of Surveillance : Discipline and Social Control in
    the United States. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press, 1997.
    Taylor, James Stacey. “Privacy and Autonomy: A Reappraisal.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 40.4 (2002): 587-604
    Weinreb, Lloyd L. “The Right to Privacy” Social Philosophy and Policy 17.2 (2000): 25-44
    中文部分:
    李松婷撰 國小兒童隱私概念之研究A Study on Children’s Concept of Privacy。  台北市:碩士論文,台北市市立師範學院國民教育研究所,2002。
    林建中撰 隱私權概念之再思考:關於概念範圍,定義,及權利形成方式。 台北市:碩士論文,台灣大學法律研究所,1999。 
    詹文凱撰 隱私權之研究。 台北:博士論文,台灣大學法律研究所,1998。
    藍培青撰 隱私權在美國演進歷程之研究。 台北縣:博士論文,私立淡江大學美國研究所,1997。
    Advisor
  • Yin-Bin Ning(甯應斌)
  • Files
  • 87124002.pdf
  • approve immediately
    Date of Submission 2006-01-26

    [Back to Results | New Search]


    Browse | Search All Available ETDs

    If you have dissertation-related questions, please contact with the NCU library extension service section.
    Our service phone is (03)422-7151 Ext. 57407,E-mail is also welcomed.